2 Corinthians 12:20-21
For I fear that perhaps when I come I may find you not as I
wish, and that you may find me not as you wish—that perhaps there may be
quarreling, jealousy, anger, hostility, slander, gossip, conceit, and disorder.
I fear that when I come again my
God may humble me before you, and I may have to mourn over many of those who
sinned earlier and have not repented of the impurity, sexual immorality, and
sensuality that they have practiced.
This small selection from today’s epistle speaks to a
concern that has occupied a great deal of my mind lately. Certainly there is much that we could
go into, such as what Paul meant when he said the church at Corinth may find
him not as they wish (he’s just been responding to some apparent slander), but
what I am most interested in today is Paul’s fear of unrepentance in the
Corinthian church.
The call we all received was to repent and believe the
gospel. Sort of. Often we were called to believe the
gospel, then eventually we heard something about repentance. Or maybe we never heard about
repentance, but we got a lot of judgment from church members because we weren’t
living in a godly way. Or maybe we
heard repentance shouted from the pulpit every week, but they never quite got
to the “believe the gospel” part.
Even then, repentance was a pretty nebulous concept for a lot of
us. So this morning I want to
spend some time with repentance.
My childish idea of repentance was more or less being sorry
that I was bad and trying to not be so bad anymore. It was essentially “apologize and quit being naughty.” That isn’t a terrible way for a child
to think of repentance, but it isn’t sufficient for an adult. Particularly since the naughtiness was
never discussed in detail, apart from a few hot button issues.
A more grown up definition of repentance (which, I will
happily admit, I did learn from pastors in church) is “turning away” from
sin. It is leaving behind the
things you did when you were a sinner and not coming back to them. As a dog returns to his vomit, so a
fool returns to his folly.
Repentance is recognizing the vomit and not returning to it. Repentance is not confession, which
only deals with admitting our sin and, depending on our tradition, possibly
receiving absolution or assurance of forgiveness or a slap on the wrist or a
pat on the head. It is the part
that comes after we confess our sin, when we resolve not to return. “Go, and sin no more.” But then what?
I often had the idea of turning away from sin mentioned to
me. Sometimes that was even
coupled with turning toward God, but not always. When it was, turning toward God was left just as vague as
the turning away from sin. So I
found myself as a child and young man turning away from a looming shadowy
nightmare, wherein dwelt the monsters of premarital sex, drunken parties,
swearing, lying, and all their unnamed companions and turning toward a distant
shadowy emptiness, wherein were the beacons of church attendance and a daily
quiet time and nothing else.
I’m reminded now of the story Jesus told of the unclean
spirit cast out of the house; the house is swept clean and the unclean spirit
goes and gets seven of his friends and comes back to the house, so the final
condition of the man is worse than the first. A few years ago a priest made this passage finally make
sense to me by coupling it with this very idea. That is, it is not sufficient simply to get rid of the bad
thing; you must also fill up the space with something good. If the house is swept clean, the
unclean spirits can return; if someone else moves into the house, there’s no
room for them. In this case we’re
talking about the Holy Spirit filling a person, but there’s a visible side to
the filling of the Holy Spirit as well, and a way that we consciously join in
his work.
The key here is the idea that we must not only turn away
from sin, but that we must turn toward God. Put another way, to turn off of the path of sin and onto the
path of righteousness. But sin is
not just a churning pot of evil and righteousness is not just a distant
radiance of goodness. There are
concrete things that are called sin and concrete things called
righteousness. We quit doing the
former and start doing the latter.
We don’t simply quit doing the former, or the former will return bigger
and badder than ever. If we think
of it in terms of the road, where one road is the road of sin and the other the
road of righteousness, then stopping sinning is stopping on the road of sin. We may not be walking down the path
anymore, but we’re still on it.
The next step we take, once we take a step, will still be on the road of
sin. Yes, I know, the analogy is
imperfect as all are. But the
point remains accurate enough for rhetoric.
So, what things should we turn away from and what things
should we turn toward? If the
problem for me growing up was that sin wasn’t very clearly defined and
righteousness was barely mentioned, then what can I offer to clarify
matters? Fortunately, scripture
gives us a lot of help. We can
start with the 600 plus laws of Torah.
They paint a great picture of the heart of God, the acts of
righteousness that he loves and the sin that he abhors. But there’s a lot to wade through and
often we Christians can get so bogged down in the food laws and the sacrifices
that we miss everything else. But
we’re in luck, because most of the New Testament was spent explaining the Old
Testament. It was also written in
forms intended to be copied and given to everyone so that even those Gentiles
who don’t know anything about God can follow him rightly. So we have teachings in short, compact
forms, often with explanations.
Much of Jesus teaching was this way. You want a primer in
righteousness? Check out the
Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5-7).
I’ve occasionally talked about this being Jesus’ dissertation on
Torah. It is often presented in a
way that makes it sound like Jesus was simply telling people that the Law was
not sufficient and that God actually demanded an even higher standard of
righteousness than the Jews thought.
A righteousness, mind you, that man can never fulfill, so God became man
to fulfill it for us and give us the credit for it, so don’t really worry about
doing any of this stuff. But what
if Jesus was actually giving us a guide to how we should live? What if he really did want us to love
our neighbors and our enemies, to accept persecution, to turn away from lust
and hatred? Guess what, he
did. It’s a high standard. (We don’t have to do it perfectly
because we don’t earn our salvation by our good works. There is forgiveness from God, as there
always has been, when we transgress the law. But it’s still the standard. It’s how God expects us to be trying to live, even when we fail.)
Okay, so Jesus teaching is great, but it’s still a lot of
teaching. The laws of Torah are
hard to chew, the teaching of Jesus is almost too rich, so where can we turn
for some simple guidance about how we ought to live in pursuit of righteousness
and repentance from sin? We’re in
luck, brothers, because St. Paul was apparently the forerunner of
BuzzFeed. He loved lists. His letters are full of lists of
righteous acts and unrighteous acts, just to make sure we know what he’s
talking about when he gives instruction.
So let’s look at some of his lists, since today’s selection includes one. (Number 4 will make your jaw drop off
of your face.)
Unrighteous acts according to 2 Cor 12:20-21: quarreling,
jealousy, anger, hostility, slander, gossip, conceit, disorder, impurity,
sexual immorality, and sensuality.
These are all things to turn away from, obviously. He doesn’t give us a list of righteous
acts here because the selection is only two verses, but there are plenty of
lists elsewhere. And with a little
thought, any of these things can be inverted to show the virtue that ought to
be pursued. Most of these are
covered under peace, contentment, encouragement, and chastity.
Taking a step away from the passage, having been given the
guideline of how to think of walking with God, I want to examine myself. What sins do I pursue? What do I continuously return to? What will I say that I have repented of
when in fact I have not repented but only been sorry for it? I am not going to list them. For one thing, there are too many to
list. For another, only a fool
bears his soul to the internet. So
instead I will walk through the tools of examination and offer some of the
thoughts that occur to me while I do.
The first step is to consider the lists of unrighteous
acts. I can see many of these
things in my life. Rather than
allowing myself to walk in these ways, I will strive to walk in their opposite
virtues. The second step for me is
to consider my cultural context.
What have I learned from being an American that has seeped into my
Christianity?
Our great cultural blinder, I believe, is the concept of the
rights of the individual. When we
apply this concept to others, it may lead to mercy and charity. These things are obviously good. But when I apply individualism or
individual rights to myself it will almost always lead me to sin. It causes me to focus on what I receive
and how I am treated. It draws me
away from loving my neighbor and even loving God, because I am hurt by how my
neighbor treats me and I am angry that God has not given me the blessings that
I desire most. I take up a
defensive position, ensuring that I will be taken care of and that no one will
hurt me more than I allow them to.
Further, it causes me to reinterpret the virtues described in scripture
and by the church in order to fit my perceived needs.
I am called to give to the poor, but if I give to the poor
then I won’t be able to afford the television that I have a right to, or the
food that I want to eat, or the house that will make my family comfortable. I am called to chastity, but my
sexuality is a part of who I am and it is oppressive to forbid me to express
it, or I have a right to get married and have children, or I don’t need to be
chaste because we really love each other.
I am called to love my enemies and pray for those who persecute me, but
I will tell everyone about what my enemies are doing to me and protest loudly
or even violently when the persecution is heavier than I believe is fair. I am called to die to myself, but I
won’t allow others to treat me as though I were dead.
I wonder if Jesus would have spoken differently had he
become incarnate in America rather than Judea. He spoke of taking up your cross, which was a way of telling
us to accept suffering, shame, and abuse.
Perhaps he might have said “Unless you surrender your rights, you cannot
be my disciple.” That certainly
carries the same connotations as crucifixion.
An issue that I have and that the American church seems to
have is that we focus on sin without considering virtue. What is worse, we focus on peripheral
sins rather than root sins. Given
that it’s a hot issue these days, the one that comes to mind first for me is
the category of “family” as we like to call it. That is, who we can marry, who we can sleep with, and what
we can do after we’ve slept with them.
(This covers divorce and remarriage, gay marriage, homosexual practice
in general, and abortion.) We take
each of these issues as an individual topic, often unrelated to the others, and
we make claims about what scripture teaches on each issue. To be sure, scripture does make claims
about each of these issues. But we
focus on these sins and on leading people away from these sins without gently
and lovingly slapping them upside the head and telling them to be chaste. Chastity is the virtue that is most
closely linked to all of these.
But we get lost in our rights.
The right to marry who I want to, even if I’m currently married to
someone else; the right to do with my body what I please. And we are seldom told that we do not
have any right to our bodies at all.
Touching on marriage a little more, and on the value of
chastity, I would like to draw a parallel between Jesus and St. Paul. When Jesus is asked about divorce, he
tells the people that Moses allowed divorce because of the hardness of their
hearts. But in the beginning it
was not meant to be that way.
Indeed, when his disciples respond that in this case it is better for a
man not to marry at all, his response is essentially “Yeah, now you’re getting
it.” And when St. Paul teaches on
marriage to the Corinthian church, he allows them to get married rather than
burn with passion. Marriage is a
concession, not a commandment. It
is certainly not a right. We can
learn something valuable by considering marriage as a sacrament, and how
priests work it out in the Catholic church. The priests are married. To God. To his
church. So we all ought to
be. Should the Lord bless us with
marriage to someone other than himself, then we ought to faithfully honor that
call. But marriage to another
person is not a right and it is not something to be sought after or pursued,
especially at the expense of our marriage to God.
But I am getting slightly off topic, as I am wont to
do. Consider it as an illustration
rather than a digression. The
point is that we only look at virtue through our cultural lens. Not simply through the lens of the
American World, but also the lens of the American Church. When something listed in scripture as a
virtue does not fit into our scope of basic human rights (life, liberty,
pursuit of happiness, etc.) we assume that it must not be a virtue and we find
a way to alter the virtue to make it more acceptable to us. Instead, we ought to consider the
virtue then alter our expectations of life. Remove the log from your eye, then you can see clearly how
to remove the other logs from your eye.
Repentance, then, for me and for many of us, must first
involve repenting of our Americanism.
We repent of Individualism, Capitalism, and Rationalism so that we can
even begin to repent of the sins that spring from them.
But it is easy to get lost again and fall into the trap of
individualism without realizing it.
American Protestantism, at least, is caught up with the idea of a
“personal relationship with God.”
This is a good thing to have, even a vital thing. But we sometimes lose focus on the important
point that it is a relationship with God and emphasize the point that it is
personal. That is, it is between
me and Jesus and has nothing to do with you. You have no right to tell me that I’m sinning, because
that’s between me and the Lord. I
can treat you badly without incurring guilt, because you aren’t involved in my
relationship with God.
I suggest that we shift our description of true Christianity
to “a personal and communal relationship with God.” This focus informs everything I have failed to say up to
this point about virtue. We do not
simply pursue God and righteousness in order that we might personally be
saved. We pursue them out of love
for God and for our neighbor. God
loves my neighbor and I love God, so I must also love my neighbor. How I treat my neighbor matters to
God. So in order to please God, I
must treat my neighbor as he desires me to treat my neighbor. And if my neighbor is a Christian, also
loving his neighbor as himself, then we will support one another, building one
another up in our faith, encouraging and not destroying one another. My good works are not for me, they are
for you. I do not give to the poor
so that I may have treasure in heaven, but so that my neighbor may eat and be
satisfied.
Further, looking to the greatest commandment for the idea of
community, I see a shared faith. “Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is
one. You shall love the Lord your
God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your might. And
these words that I command you today shall be on your heart. You shall teach them diligently to your
children, and shall talk of them when you sit in your house, and when you walk
by the way, and when you lie down, and when you rise. You shall bind them as a sign on your hand, and they shall
be as frontlets between your eyes.
You shall write them on the doorposts of your house and on your gates.”
Often Christianity, or church, is little more than a Jesus
club. What we have in common is
the same faith, and that unites us to one another. We get together once or twice a week and celebrate the thing
we love. Then we go on our way and
don’t mention it again until we get together the next week. I call it a Jesus club, but the truth is
that it is often even less than that.
If I join a club, be it for a sports team or a hobby or a TV show that I
enjoy, odds are that it will be something that takes up a considerable amount
of my intention. I will force my
love of that thing on other people without their consent given the slightest
opportunity. Given how much I love
the show, I will be sad when the season ends and excited for the next season
premiere and my sadness or excitement will bleed into the rest of what I
do. And when I get together with
other members of my club, even outside of club meetings, odds are that we will
spend a lot of time talking about it.
In Christianity, we often refuse even to speak of God or our faith
outside the time specifically devoted to it. Because it is (ahem, cultural blinder) impolite to talk
about religion. And my
relationship with God is between me and him.
Obviously I love talking about religion. I’m a church nerd. And obviously I don’t think that God
was only commanding that we talk about him when we get together. But it is worth mentioning that a
little more talking about God when we interact with one another would not be a
bad thing. Talk about God with
other Christians (not just about theology or church history, but God himself)
and see how the rest of the conversation or the time together takes on a new
character. It somehow sanctifies
the time. It invites God into the
conversation and often changes how we interact with one another.
But even when we aren’t talking about religion, we carry
Christ with us as a sign on our hands and frontlets between our eyes. Often we get into a social setting and
forget our Christianity altogether.
We get caught up with our selves.
We focus on our own enjoyment or how we are being treated without considering
how we are treating our neighbors.
We expect people to adapt to us, to make us happy, to be careful of our
rights. Instead, we ought to be
considering how we can die to ourselves and love our neighbors.
This seems like a far stretch from where I started. But my point is this: When we repent it is not simply
acknowledging that we sin and trying to not sin so much anymore. Repentance is a complete turning away
from a life of sin and a complete turning toward a life of righteousness. When we repent, we give up all that we
were and all that we pursued beforehand.
We walk toward God, walking in virtue and cultivating virtue. We love others, seeing that they and
not we are the ones worthy of honor.
We die and are raised to an entirely new life. Some talk about a call to radical repentance, which gives a
false conception. It implies that
there is some other form of repentance.
As though Jesus would like us to radically repent, but is willing to
accept moderate repentance. But we
were not called to get sick to ourselves, we were called to die.
St. Paul feared that he might return to Corinth and find
that those who had professed to repent had not in fact repented. Jesus also spoke of his return, asking “When
the Son of Man returns, will he find faith on the earth?” Will he find those who have died to
themselves and pursued him and his righteousness, or will he mourn over our lack
of repentance?
These questions are not meant to be manipulative. I am not trying to produce an intense
emotional reaction, which I will follow up with an altar call. These are questions that I ask myself,
and that are meant for serious self-examination. Where do I still allow myself to sin, not out of weakness
but out of rebellion? Where do I
find myself acting out sinful desire instead of slaying it with a sword of
virtue? Where do I insist that God
and my neighbor love me while I refuse to love them?
May the Lord grant us wisdom and true repentance, that we
may honor him and show forth his glory through the good works of faith that he
has prepared for us to do.
No comments:
Post a Comment